Title The Effects of Mindfulness and Meditation on Vagally Mediated Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis.
Author Brown, Lydia; Rando, Alora A; Eichel, Kristina; Van Dam, Nicholas T; Celano, Christopher M; Huffman, Jeff C; Morris, Meg E
Journal Psychosom Med Publication Year/Month 2021-Jul-Aug
PMID 33395216 PMCID PMC8243562
Affiliation 1.From the La Trobe University (Brown, Morris), Melbourne; Melbourne School of Psychological sciences (Brown, Van Dam), University of Melbourne, Parkville; North Eastern Rehabilitation Centre (Brown, Morris), Healthscope Hospitals, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Suffolk University (Rando), Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (Eichel), Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Psychiatry (Van Dam), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Massachusetts General Hospital (Celano, Huffman); and Harvard Medical School (Celano, Huffman), Boston, Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVE: Heart rate variability (HRV) is a marker of autonomic nervous system function associated with both physical and mental health. Many studies have suggested that mindfulness and meditation-based interventions (MBIs) are associated with improvements in HRV, but findings are mixed, and to date, no comprehensive meta-analysis has synthesized results. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted using PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, ERIC, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of predominantly seated MBIs on resting-state vagally mediated HRV. Risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis found that MBIs were not efficacious in increasing vagally mediated resting-state HRV relative to control conditions (Hedges g = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.014 to 0.77). When removing an outlier (g = 3.22), the effect size was reduced, CI narrowed, and findings remained nonsignificant (g = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.39). High heterogeneity in results (I2 = 89.12%) could not be explained by a priori-determined moderators including intervention duration, study setting, and control type. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to indicate that MBIs lead to improvements in vagally mediated HRV over control conditions. Future large, well-designed RCTs with low risk of methodological bias could help add to the current evidence to elucidate any role MBIs might play in impacting HRV.

  • Copyright © 2023
    National Institute of Pathogen Biology, CAMS & PUMC, Bejing, China
    All rights reserved.