Title | A Walking Intervention to Increase Weekly Steps in Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. | ||
Author | Sheshadri, Anoop; Kittiskulnam, Piyawan; Lazar, Ann A; Johansen, Kirsten L | ||
Journal | Am J Kidney Dis | Publication Year/Month | 2020-Apr |
PMID | 31679747 | PMCID | PMC7089809 |
Affiliation + expend | 1.Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: anoop.sheshadri@ucsf.edu. |
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients receiving dialysis report very low physical activity. We implemented a pilot trial to assess the feasibility of a pedometer-based intervention to gather preliminary evidence about its impact on physical activity, symptoms, and surrogates of cardiovascular risk. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 60 dialysis patients from San Francisco dialysis clinics. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receiving pedometers with weekly step goals or usual care for 3 months. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was step counts, measured using pedometers. Secondary outcomes included physical performance using the Short Physical Performance Battery, the Physical Function and Vitality scales of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Dialysis Symptoms Index, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, with endothelial function as a secondary and heart rate variability as an exploratory surrogate measure of cardiovascular risk. Targeted enrollment was 50% and targeted completion was 85%. RESULTS: 49% of approached patients were enrolled, and 92% completed the study. After 3 months, patients randomly assigned to the intervention (n=30) increased their average daily steps by 2,256 (95% CI, 978-3,537) more than the 30 controls (P<0.001). Heart rate variability (standard deviation of N-N intervals) increased by 14.94 (95% CI, 0.31-33.56) millisecondsin the intervention group as compared with controls (P = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences across intervention groups in symptoms, physical performance, or endothelial function. Participants in the intervention group reverted to baseline steps during the postintervention follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The Northern California study setting may limit generalizability. Walking does not capture the full spectrum of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term pedometer-based intervention led to increased step counts in dialysis patients, but the increase was not sustained. Pedometer-based interventions are feasible for dialysis patients, but future studies are needed to address whether more prolonged interventions can improve physical function or symptoms. FUNDING: Supported by grants from the American Kidney Fund, National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and International Society of Nephrology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT02623348.